| Project: | TAPAS |
|---|---|
| Internal Release Number: | X.Y.Z |
| Related Documents: |
LINKS TO RELEVANT
STANDARDS
LINKS TO OTHER DOCUMENTS
|
|
Direct Actors: |
MD: physician using the system. Nurse: nurse using the system MOA: Medical Office Assistant Admin: System Administrator |
|---|---|
|
Stakeholders: |
Project Owners and other members |
|
Prereq: |
User is logged in |
|
Notes: |
The acronym CAVE was developed to describe common activities for clinical elements:
Use Cases with a PDA component will have a PDA icon attached and additional notes. Some PDA specific use cases are also described if they have no desktop equivalent. For the sake of these use cases, the editing functionality on the PDA is described. NOTE: at this time the editing patient summaries on a PDA is out of scope of this project. These are left in for future work and to remind the PDA development team of where we want to go in future iterations. |
| Audit Trails: | The system will support the documenting of all changes to all elements as part of the "editing". Who and when each element was changed must be recorded in the system. |
|
The sysadmin module contains use cases for the management of the system including adding users, managing user passwords, etc. |
|
Summary: |
CAVE system user: the system must have the ability to manage users in the system. Like clinical data, users should not be able to be deleted from the system as they will be tied to activities in a record. This is particularly important when one needs to review audit trails, etc. User data that will need to be captured here should reflect all the information that the system needs to have for authentication, privacy, role definition, etc plus information to support the management of users in the clinic (ie phone numbers, etc). |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Rarely |
|
Direct Actors: |
Admin |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
Summary: |
Request a new user password. A user may forget his or her password from time to time. This needs to be considered by the system and provide the sys admin the ability to reset / request a new password. A process will be needed to provide the temporary password to the user that is secure. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Rarely |
|
Direct Actors: |
Admin, (any actor) |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary: |
CAVE PDA accounts. Some users will have a PDA account - that is a PDA that will be assigned to the server and to their own account that will be able to sync to the PDA for syncing of personal messages and patient summaries (and future patient data). |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Rarely |
|
Direct Actors: |
Admin |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
Summary: |
CAVE Module Elements: TAPAS is to be designed as a modular system where new modules can be added to an instance from a library of TAPAS modules as they are created. In the first iteration, all modules will be added and active. in future iterations, modules for various targeted conditions can be added (eg management of maternity care, management of diabetic patients, etc). |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Medium |
|
Use Frequency: |
Rarely |
|
Direct Actors: |
Admin |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary: |
Update / install software to a physician's PDA |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Weekly |
|
Direct Actors: |
Admin |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
This is a system wide approach to managing software on the PDAs for users. It should work in parallel with their personal use of the PDAs (ie they can install their own personal software) |
|
Summary: |
Register a PDA: before being used, a PDA must be securely registered to a user account. Without this manual process that requires activation from the trusted sys-admin, the user will not be able to get information from a server account to their PDA. This |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Rarely |
|
Direct Actors: |
Admin |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
This collection of Use Cases describes the management of patient information and the workflows of elements like referrals, etc that are managed by the medical office assistant. The key distinction here is that core clinical elements of the record / summary are not modified by the user. Elements like demographics, address, status of a referral are managed. |
|
Summary: |
CAVE a patient record. Patients need to be added to the system and when they are, their record must be created . This use case describes the creation of new patients in the system, as well as managing their demographic data by any clinical user (MD, MOA, Nurse, etc). Searching for a patient record is described in the View aspect of this use case. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Several times a day |
|
Direct Actors: |
MOA, MD |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary: |
Patient cover sheets are important in a paper-based practice or in a hybrid practice. The system should be able to print out an up to date cover sheet. This could be used to attach to the front of a paper chart or a number of other clinical tasks. The cover sheet would include demographics as well as the core medical summary. This becomes less useful as a provider moves to a paperless practice but is key to a hybrid practice. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Expected |
|
Use Frequency: |
Many times a week |
|
Direct Actors: |
MOA, MD |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary: |
This system will still
existing in a paper / electronic hybrid
environment and label printing will be essential to the smooth running
of the office. The system should support common label shapes from an
easy interface. Labels will need to be printed so they can be used for
patient requisitions such as: Name, Date of Birth, Age, Address, phone
number, health ID, GP name, GP College ID. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Expected |
|
Use Frequency: |
Daily |
|
Direct Actors: |
MOA, MD |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary: |
Patient summaries are
important in a paper-based system or in
a hybrid system. the system should be able to print out an up to date
medical summary. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Expected |
|
Use Frequency: |
Many times a week |
|
Direct Actors: |
MOA, (+ ???) |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary: |
Patient summaries will need to be exported from TAPAS to other systems for a variety of reasons, including: patient moving, system upgrades, physicians moving to another office. Electronic migration of the patient data is, therefore, critical to allow these necessary tasks in managing the healthcare data. The system must be able to support the exporting of EMS data to other systems on a per patient basis or in a batch process. Batch process needs to filter on a group of patients by physician or by name. The eMS export will only capture a current snapshot of the patient. The current eMS standard does not support the exporting of the complete data set, therefore this system will only support the data set as per the eMS standard. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Expected |
|
Use Frequency: |
Occasionally |
|
Direct Actors: |
MOA |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
This section pertains to the management of the referral process (thus the "meta" in the title). These use cases pertain primarily to office staff who need to maintain the list of specialists and manage the referrals that are in process. The creation of individual patient referrals is documented in use case XXX. |
|
Summary: |
One of the tasks that the practice manages on a daily basis is referrals to specialists. These referrals follow certain workflows and have to be followed up regularly. Considerable time is spent each day managing referrals in a busy practice. As referrals to be written inside the TAPAS|ems system, it is expected that the MOAs are also supported in the management of referrals. The MOAs and other users should be able to manage the status of referrals of a selected patient electronically in a way that supports their current practice and saves them time. This Use Case refers to the management of the referrals of a single patient. management of a collection of workflows is described in use case CLAREF-02 |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Expected |
|
Use Frequency: |
Daily |
|
Direct Actors: |
MOA , MD |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary: |
One of the tasks that the practice manages on a daily basis is referrals to specialists. These referrals follow certain workflows and have to be followed up regularly. Considerable time is spent each day managing referrals in a busy practice. As referrals to be written inside the TAPAS|ems system, it is expected that the MOAs are also supported in the management of referrals. Referrals to other specialists have a particular workflow. The referral management system needs to support that workflow, allowing MOAs to review outstanding referrals that they are responsible for and change their status based on updates from specialists and patients. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Expected |
|
Use Frequency: |
Often |
|
Direct Actors: |
MOA |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary: |
The list of specialist to whom can be referred has to be maintained. This module allows the user to do that. Key information that will be updated will be: name, address, phone, fax, specialty, and staff names. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Expected |
|
Use Frequency: |
Monthly |
|
Direct Actors: |
MOA |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
A common task of medical office assistants and nurses is to request a prescription refill of the physician. These use cases describe this process which should be supported in this system. |
|
Summary: |
This function allows the MOA or nurse to request a refill for (an) existing prescription(s) to an MD. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Multiple times a day |
|
Direct Actors: |
MOA (+ nurse) |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary: |
This function allows the user to view the patient's active prescriptions Rx PLUS the RxHx (history of prescriptions). it is an key function of a system to allow the user to review medications that a patient is taking. This use case has been separated out as MOAs and nurses are not able to edit the prescription. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Multiple times a day |
|
Direct Actors: |
MOA, MD, Nurse |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
A diverse collection of use cases for the management of the system and various clinical / admin tasks such as messaging between providers, etc. These use cases do not discribe the maintenance of any particular patient information. |
|
Summary: |
Administrate the call
schedule. The call schedule is the
schedule of physicians in a practice who are "on call" for evenings and
weekends. This schedule will need to be edited and accessed
on a
regular basis by members of the team. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Med. |
|
Use Frequency: |
Daily - view, weekly -
edit |
|
Direct Actors: |
MOA, MD |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary:
|
Proper communication is an important part of the workflow in an office. One way to support this workflow is to provide electronic messaging. This use case describes the CAVEing (Create / Archive / View / Edit) of secure messages between providers and users of the system. PDA: This messaging will be integrated with the PDA so that users can write messages on the PDA and sync them to the server. Messages will be synced bidirectionally. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Expected |
|
Use Frequency: |
Multiple times a day |
|
Direct Actors: |
MOA, MD |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
The Patient Module contains use cases that pertain to the general management of patient clinical data. Management of this data is restricted to "clinician" users - MDs, nurses, etc. Some of the more detailed modules are described in their own categories. Future modules may be described with expansion of the system. |
|
Summary:
|
Users will have to be able to access patient records quickly and intuitively through a search feature from wherever they are in the system. This is a "targeted" clinical information system and will contain onlyl a subset of the patient population for a practice or group. It is not expected in a targeted system, such as TAPAS, that all patients will be recorded in the information system. There will not be a scheduling system for patient encounters in this version of TAPAS. Therefore, the main way of accessing patients will be through a search interface. This interface must be quick and efficient and intuitive to the user. PDA: On the PDA the user must be able to search for patients as well. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Multiple times a day |
|
Direct Actors: |
MD |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary:
|
A function to CAVE the Problems portion of the medical summary. Active problems are the list (with description / comments) of current, active conditions that the clinician feels are significant to document in the chart / summary. For example, hypertension is a chronic condition with many ramifications on the patient's health status and should be documented. A "cold" in an otherwise healthy 22 year old may not be significant enough to document in the cumulative summary as it is self limiting. Pneumonia in a frail 92 year old would be worth documenting if they were headed to the hospital and could be archived when the pneumonia resolved. Problems that are no longer active can be archived. During the arcive process users will need to be able to have the option to "move" the problem to past medical history or not. PDA: The PDA must have the ability to CAVE active problems. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
With every patient / whenever there is a change in the patient heath status |
|
Direct Actors: |
MD (Nurse) |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary:
|
For the medical Hx list, each element should document a medical diagnosis that the clinician feels is an important part of the patient's history. To CAVE these elements is as you would CAVE a generic element of the medical summary. For the sake of this document this will be described in more detail here. the comment field must be available for users to add comments to the medical history that may be helpful in delivering care. PDA: The user must have the ability to CAVE these elements on the PDA and sync changes to the server. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Daily |
|
Direct Actors: |
MD (Nurse) |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
updating the medical summary should never result in lost work during the visit. |
|
Summary:
|
The surgical history section of the summary captures details of the procedures performed on the patient. These would include any invasive procedures such as tissue or organ removal, surgical repair, etc. This would not include procedures such as diagnostic imaging which occur elsewhere in the summary. This will capture the basic procedure code and the date it was performed. The free text comment field can be used for extra details such as the surgeon who performed the procedure and for comments about the procedure if needed.
PDA: The user must have the ability to CAVE these elements on the PDA and sync changes to the server. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Daily |
|
Direct Actors: |
MD (Nurse) |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
updating the medical summary should never result in lost work during the visit. |
|
Summary:
|
Family history documents the medical conditions that the clinician feels are important from the patients genetic family. These are important conditions that may have an impact on the current patient. Conditions such as diabetes, heart disease, and some cancers are important. They can increase the patient's risk of these conditions and / or change the management of the patient (increase screening, trigger more aggressive treatment). It is important to document, beyond the normal elements for a module, the family member who is affected by relationship to the patient. PDA: The user must have the ability to CAVE these elements on the PDA and sync changes to the server. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Daily |
|
Direct Actors: |
MD (Nurse) |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary:
|
Social history includes elements of a patient's life that are more related to behaviour. These can include housing, exercise, substance abuse, etc. Documentation will be the same as other sections: code, start date, end date, free text comments.
PDA: The user must have the ability to CAVE these elements on the PDA and sync changes to the server. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Daily |
|
Direct Actors: |
MD (Nurse) |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary:
|
MDs within a group practice (or virtual group practice) need a method of communication about patients. TAPAS will support two modes of communication: provider to provider (messaging) and Patient Condition Flags (PCFs). PCFs are designed to provide an active alerting system for pending "to do" elements for a specific patient while care is shared, particularly while on call. for example, if something needs to be followed up while on call (i.e. a patient is in the hospital) that can be documented within an active flag It is expected that these flags will become more robust in the future, allowing for a variety of alerts and reminders to be tagged to patient charts. For now they will be a simple flag that will allow for author, date activated, category, room for text comment, and a flag for active / inactive (archived). inactive / archived flags can we seen in the patient summary history but are not synced to the PDA, nor are they shown in lists of active flags. PDA: The user must have the ability to CAVE these elements on the PDA and sync changes to the server. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Daily |
|
Direct Actors: |
MD/ Nurse |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary:
|
MDs will need to review existing, active patient condition flags in a list format. This will act as a to do list and will need to be available on the desktop AND the PDA. This list will only show active flags. Tapping on a flag will allow the user to CAVE that element. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Daily |
|
Direct Actors: |
|
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
| Summary:
|
The proper documentation of allergies is key in providing good shared care. The TAPAS system needs to have well documented and coded allergies to ensure that they will be be available to support the care provider and the system in improving care. Allergies need to be documented with some key elements: substance, type of allergy, date first noted, date documented, who documented it, and a free text section for additional comments.
PDA: The user must have the ability to CAVE these elements on the PDA and sync changes to the server. |
|---|---|
| Priority: |
Essential |
| Use Frequency: |
Daily |
| Direct Actors: |
MD (Nurse) |
| Main Success Scenario: |
|
| Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
| Notes and Questions |
| Summary:
|
Immunizations need to be documented too. The TAPAS system needs to have well documented and coded immunizations to ensure that they will be be available to support the care provider and the system in improving care. Immunizations need to be documented with some key elements: for which illness, immunization substance, type of immunization, date of immunization, date of follow-up, who documented it, and a free text section for additional comments.
PDA: The user must have the ability to CAVE these elements on the PDA and sync changes to the server. |
|---|---|
| Priority: |
Essential |
| Use Frequency: |
Daily |
| Direct Actors: |
MD (Nurse) |
| Main Success Scenario: |
|
| Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
| Notes and Questions |
|
| Summary:
|
Section will contain alternative treatments (such as a herbal remedy) that are nog categorized in other sections. This is a section of the e-MS and can be used to capture additional information in the summary. |
|---|---|
| Priority: |
Medium |
| Use Frequency: |
Weekly |
| Direct Actors: |
MD (Nurse) |
| Main Success Scenario: |
|
| Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
| Notes and Questions |
|
Referrals are communications with other MDs, typically specialists (eg surgical) or specialist GPs (eg addictions or obstetrics) when the MD wants to have a second opinion / diagnostic support / therapeutic suggestions / or a transfer of care. Typically, a referral requires a note of some kind from the MD to the specialist. The more detailed the note, the more helpful to the MD. However, due to the time constraints in practice, referral notes often do not have all the information they could have. Much of the information that is needed in the referral note is duplicated from the chart and medical summary. |
|
Summary: |
The referral process should support the workflow of the MDs and write most of the referral by pulling out information from the current medical summary (patient demographics, problem list, medical, surgical, family history, medication, allergies, etc) as well as information about the MDs (address, phone numbers, etc of both the referring and referred MDs). The MD will need to write a note describing the specifics of the reason(s) for referral and any extra detail not captured in the summary. The status of the referral will need to be set as well by the MD. Current workflow will be paper based; however, future workflows will need to support health authority electronic procedures when they are established (through the e-MS standard). |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
Daily |
|
Direct Actors: |
MD (Nurse) |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
The prescription writer will allow MDs to view and manage the daily tasks of medication management in a practice. The use cases are broken down into component parts so that they can be re-used in the design. It is envisioned that the actual workflow will be a continuous and smooth process. For version one of TAPAS, we will be using the Health Canada Drug Database (provided with permission for use by UBC in our projects by Health Canada). |
|
Summary:
|
MD writes medication prescription for a patient. Choice of medication should be by generic name or by trade name (with generic as the preference). this should be as easily searchable as the patient list. PDA: The user must have the ability to CAVE these elements on the PDA and sync changes to the server. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
10-20 times / day |
|
Direct Actors: |
MD |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary:
|
MD writes medication prescription for a patient -- picking Dose. Ideally the system will suggest to the user the common dosages of a medication. This should reduce errors. however, the health Canada database likely does not categorize its information in a way that will allow us to provide this. We will have to look more closely at this when we begin building this module. number of tablets should be a combo box that allows for common number of tablets (1/4, 1/2, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, and 5 tablets would cover most medications). The user should have the ability to adjust if needed in some manner if it does not fit the drop down box. PDA: The user must have the ability to CAVE these elements on the PDA and sync changes to the server. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
10-20 times / day |
|
Direct Actors: |
MD |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary:
|
MD writes medication prescription for a patient -- picking Frequency. Common frequencies will be presented in a pick list and the user can overwrite their own. Common frequencies include:
This is required and could default to the medication's recommended frequency is possible otherwise there should be no default as we do not want to recommend to the user an inappropriate frequency. The system should also support the "as needed" flag (PRN) for medications that should be used only "when needed". The PRN flag supports the frequency rates above (ie Q6h PRN = as needed up to a maximum dose of every six hours). These should be taken from the eMS standard.
PDA: The user must have the ability to CAVE these elements on the PDA and sync changes to the server. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
10-20 times / day |
|
Direct Actors: |
MD |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary:
|
MD writes medication prescription for a patient -- picking Route. Common routes will include: PO, topical, SC, IM, IV, Inhaled, Nasal, PR, etc. These should be available from a pick list and specific to the medication if possible. PDA: The user must have the ability to CAVE these elements on the PDA and sync changes to the server. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
10-20 times / day |
|
Direct Actors: |
MD |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|
|
Notes and Questions |
|
|
Summary:
|
MD writes medication prescription for a patient -- picking Duration Duration can be defined in two ways -- by total number of doses or by number of days. Some MDs prescribe in different ways. We should consider supporting both. Default to days. No default on the numeric component in this version. Refills: non-negative integer. Defaults to 0 refills. Alerts if >12 refills. PDA: The user must have the ability to CAVE these elements on the PDA and sync changes to the server. |
|---|---|
|
Priority: |
Essential |
|
Use Frequency: |
10-20 times / day |
|
Direct Actors: |
MD |
|
Main Success Scenario: |
|
|
Alternative Scenario Extensions: |
|